top of page
Search

Scientific Evidence For and Against Remote Viewing

"I am convinced that there are genuine and valid psychic phenomena. They are not supernatural, but rather the result of highly natural but little understood faculties of the human mind." - Albert Einstein


Remote viewing, a term coined in the 1970s, refers to the ability to gather information about a distant or unseen target through extrasensory perception (ESP). The practice of remote viewing is controversial and has been the subject of scientific scrutiny for decades. Some people claim that remote viewing is a legitimate psychic phenomenon, while others dismiss it as pseudoscience. In this article, we'll explore the scientific evidence for and against remote viewing and examine the arguments made by both sides.


Disclosure: This page contains Amazon affiliate links. If you choose to purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend products that we believe in and/or have personally used. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We comply with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines for affiliate marketing. Thank you for supporting our blog and the products that we love!

The Earth


The Case For Remote Viewing

The most persuasive arguments in favor of remote viewing come from anecdotal evidence and personal experiences. Many people claim to have had success with remote viewing, including former military personnel involved in the US government's Stargate Project. The Stargate Project was a top-secret program in which military personnel were trained in remote viewing techniques and used them to gather intelligence on foreign targets. According to some accounts and declassified documents, remote viewing was highly effective in providing accurate information that could not have been obtained through traditional intelligence methods.


Our book, Awaken Your Intuition: The ABCs of Remote Viewing, provides a comprehensive guide to remote viewing and includes case studies of successful remote viewing sessions. The book argues that remote viewing is a skill that can be developed by anyone and that it has practical applications in fields such as law enforcement, business, history, and personal development.


The Case Against Remote Viewing

On the other hand, a part of the scientific community has been highly skeptical of remote viewing, citing a lack of reproducibility and the inability to explain the underlying mechanisms of the phenomenon. One of the most notable critics of remote viewing is Carl Sagan, an astronomer and science communicator. Sagan once famously said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."


Other critics argue that remote viewing is simply a form of confirmation bias, in which people interpret vague or ambiguous information to fit their preconceived notions. This is known as the "file-drawer effect," in which unsuccessful experiments are not reported, leading to a biased view of the success rates of remote viewing.


Scientific Evidence For Remote Viewing

Despite the lack of consensus in the scientific community, thousands of studies have been conducted to examine the validity of remote viewing. One of the most famous of these studies was conducted by psychologists Daryl Bem and Charles Honorton in the 1980s. The study, which was later criticized for methodological flaws, purported to show that participants were able to accurately perceive distant images through extrasensory perception.


In a more recent study, published in the Journal of Parapsychology in 2018, researchers attempted to replicate the results of the Bem-Honorton study using a more rigorous methodology.


Additionally, you can check our the list of articles to further explore this topic, in particular: What Is The Science Behind Remote Viewing? and Is Remote Viewing a Valuable Tool or Hoax?


Conclusion

So, what is the verdict on remote viewing? There is empirical evidence to support the claims made by remote viewing proponents. However, we agree remote viewing faces limitations detailed in the online Remote Viewing Basics course.


References

Here are some references that may be helpful for further exploration of "Scientific Evidence For and Against Remote Viewing:"


Comentarios

Obtuvo 0 de 5 estrellas.
Aún no hay calificaciones

Agrega una calificación
bottom of page