top of page
Search

Is Remote Viewing a Valuable Tool or Hoax?

"All great truths begin as blasphemies." - George Bernard Shaw.


Remote viewing is a controversial psychic ability that has sparked heated debates in scientific and paranormal communities alike. Some believe that remote viewing can provide valuable insights, while others dismiss it as a hoax. Despite its potential benefits, remote viewing also raises concerns about fraud and deception. In this article, we delve into the shadowy side of remote viewing, exploring the possible ways this psychic ability could be exploited for deceitful purposes. Get ready to discover the dark side of remote viewing and its potential for manipulation.


Disclosure: This page contains Amazon affiliate links. If you choose to purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend products that we believe in and/or have personally used. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We comply with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines for affiliate marketing. Thank you for supporting our blog and the products that we love!

Remote Viewing a topic that generates a debate in 2023.

What is Remote Viewing?

Remote viewing is a psychic ability that allows a person to gather information about a distant or unseen target using only their mind. Remote viewers claim to be able to see, hear, feel, and sense information about a target that is located far away or hidden from view. Remote viewers often work in pairs, with one person acting as the "viewer" and the other as the "monitor." The viewer attempts to gather information about the target, while the monitor encourages and pushes the viewer to work harder. In addition, a monitor verifies that the viewer follows the structure.


Remote viewing gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s when the United States government sponsored a program called Stargate Project. The program was created to investigate the potential military applications of psychic abilities such as remote viewing. While the results of Stargate Project are still debated today, many people believe that the program was successful in demonstrating the potential of remote viewing.


Is Remote Viewing a Valuable Tool or Hoax?

Remote viewers often claim to be able to gather information about a target that is impossible to obtain through conventional means. For example, a remote viewer might claim to be able to see inside a sealed envelope or to describe the interior of a hidden bunker. Skeptics argue that such claims are impossible to verify and that remote viewers could easily be faking their abilities.


Unfortunately, there have been a significant amount of remote viewing examples being used for fraudulent purposes. One such example involves a famous self-proclaimed psychic who claimed to have used remote viewing to predict major world events. In 2016, this person was convicted of multiple counts of fraud for using his alleged psychic abilities to swindle clients out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.


One possible way that remote viewing could be used for fraudulent purposes is by using leading questions. A leading question is a question that suggests a particular answer. For example, a remote viewer might be asked, "Can you see a red car?" The question suggests that the target is a red car, which could lead the remote viewer to provide inaccurate information.


Another possible way that a remote viewer might be given subtle cues or hints that could influence their perceptions. This is known as the "Clever Hans" effect, named after a horse in the early 1900s who appeared to be able to perform mathematical calculations and other feats of intelligence. It was later discovered that the horse was simply picking up on unconscious cues from his trainer, such as body language or subtle facial expressions, and responding accordingly.


Limiting Fraud and Deception

There are some steps that can be taken to limit the risk of fraud and deception in remote viewing


One of the most important steps is to follow the Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) methodology and its requirements. The viewer and monitor work with blind targets. As such, they do not have any information on what they are looking for. Thus, when viewers perform a session, they should not be told, nor should they guess, details about the case.


Another way to limit fraud and deception is to work with reputable remote viewing organization. Look for businesses and practitioners who have a proven track record and who are willing to provide references or testimonials from satisfied clients. Avoid working with practitioners who make grandiose claims or who charge exorbitant fees for their services.


Conclusion

Ultimately, the potential for fraud and deception in remote viewing cannot be completely eliminated, but can be reduced by approaching the practice with skepticism and critical thinking. Following the Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) requirements, remote viewers can work to minimize the impact of these factors and gain a deeper understanding of the world around them. In that situation, remote viewing is a valuable tool and not an hoax.


References

Here are some reading materials that can help you delve deeper into the topic:

  • Awaken Your Intuition: The ABCs of Remote Viewing by Benoit Fabreguettes and Laurent Masotti is a comprehensive guide to learning the basics of remote viewing. The book provides detailed instructions and exercises to help readers develop their intuition and psychic abilities, and ultimately learn to use remote viewing as a tool to gain insights into their lives and the world around them.

  • Remote Viewing Secrets: A Handbook by Joseph McMoneagle is a practical guide to remote viewing techniques and provides tips for improving one's ability to perform remote viewing.

  • Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies by Jim Schnabel tells the story of the US government's secret psychic spying program, Project Stargate, which utilized remote viewers to gather intelligence.

Additionally, you can check out our the list of related articles to further explore this topic.


Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page